D. Buitron, The Odyssey and Ancient Art, Annandale-on-Hudson 1992 A.R. Burn, The world of Hesiod. A study of the greek middle ages c. 900-700 B.C., New York 1966. M. Carlisle, ‘Homeric Fictions: pseudo-words in Homer’, in M. Carlisle-O. Levaniouk (edd.), Nine Essays on Homer, Lanham-Boulder-New York-Oxford 1999, pp. 55-91. B. Alexanderson, ‘Homeric Formulae for Ship’, Eranos 68 (1970), pp. 1-46. Ø. Andersen, ‘The making of the past in the Iliad’, HSPh 93 (1990), pp. 25-45. Ø. Andersen, ‘Allusion and the Audience of Homer’, in M. Paisi-Apostolopoulou (ed.), Homerica, Ithaca 1998, pp. 137-149 . E.J. Bakker – F. Fabbricotti, ‘Peripheral and Nuclear Semantics in Homeric Diction. The Case of dative Expression for Spear’, Mnemosyne 44 (1991), pp. 63-84. E. Bakker, ‘Noun-Epithet Formulas, Milman Parry, and the Grammar of Poetry’, in J.P. Crielaard (ed.), Homeric Questions: Essay in Philology, Ancient History and Archeology, Including the Papers of a Conference Organized by the Netherlands Institute at Athens (15 May 1993), Amsterdam 1995, pp. 97-125. E. Bakker, A. Kahane, Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance, and the Epic Text, Cambridge Mass. 1997. H.R. Barnes, ‘Enjambement and Oral Composition’, TAPhA 109 (1979), pp. 1-10. C.R. Beye, The Iliad, The Odyssey and the Epic Tradition, Gloucester Mass. 1972. C. O. Pavese, F. Boschetti, A Complete Formular Analysis of the Homeric Poems, Amsterdam 2003. N.M. Bradbury, ‘Traditional Referentiality: The Aesthetic Power of Oral Traditional Structures’, in J.M. Foley (ed.), Teaching Oral Traditions, New York 1998a, pp. 136-45. J.M. Bremer – I.J.F. de Jong – J. Kalff (a c. di), Homer: Beyond Oral Poetry. Recent Trends in Homeric Interpretations, Amsterdam 1987. H.R. Barnes, ‘The Colometric Structure of Homeric Hexameter’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 27 (1986), pp. 125-150. G.M. Calhoun, ‘Homeric Repetitions’, University of California Publications in Classical Philology 12 (1933), pp. 1-25. G.M. Calhoun, ‘The art of Formula in Homer – ἔπεα πτερόεντα’, Classical Philology 30 (1935), pp. 215-227. A. Camerotto, ‘Towards a Thematic Analysis of the Homeric Poems’, Gaia 7 (2003), pp. 147-157. H. Clarke, ‘Parry and Homer. The aesthetics of oral composition’, in H.R. Runte – R. Runte (edd.), Orality and literature. Proceedings of the XIth congress of the International Comparative Literature Association, New York 1991, pp. 11-17 (ed. or. Paris 1985). A. Cook, ‘Some thoughts on how to discuss epic poetry’, Helios 10.1 (1983), pp. 85-91. W.D.E. Coulson, ‘Oral poetry and neoanalysis. A possible rapprochement ?’, Critical Exchange 16 (1984), pp. 23-26. J.P. Crielaard (ed.), Homeric Questions: Essay in Philology, Ancient History and Archeology, Including the Papers of a Conference Organized by the Netherlands Institute at Athens (15 May 1993), Amsterdam 1995. G. Danek, ‘Traditional referentiality and Homeric Intertextuality’, in F. Montanari, Omero tremila anni dopo, Roma 2002, pp. 3-19. T. De Vet, ‘The Joint Role of Orality and Literacy in the Composition, Transmission, and Performance of the Homeric Texts: A Comparative View’, TAPhA 126 (1996), pp. 43-76. C. Dougherty, ‘Phemius last stand : The impact of occasion on tradition in the Odyssey’, OralTradition 6 (1991), pp. 93-103. J.J. Duggan, Oral Literature: Seven Essays, New York 1975. Z. Dukat, ‘The validity of the comparative method in Homeric studies’, ZAnt 28 (1978), pp. 171-178. M.W. Edwards, ‘Philology and the Oral Theory’, PCP 17 (1982), pp. 1-8. M.W. Edwards, ‘Homer and Oral Tradition: The Formula, Part I’, Oral Tradition 1 (1986), pp. 171-230. M.W. Edwards, ‘Homer and Oral Tradition: The Formula, Part II’ Oral Tradition 3 (1988), pp. 11-60. A.T. Edwards, ‘Κλέος ἄφθιτον and oral theory’, CQ 38 (1988), pp. 25-30. M.W. Edwards, ‘Homer and Oral Tradition: The Type-Scene’, Oral Tradition 7 (1992), pp. 284-330. V. Edwards - T. J. Sienkewicz, Oral cultures past and present. Rappin’ and Homer, Oxford 1990. H. Erbse, ‘Milman Parry und Homer’, Hermes 122 (1994), pp. 256-274. B. Fenik, Typical Battle Scenes in the Iliad, Wiesbaden 1968. B. Fenik, Studies in the Odyssey, Wiesbaden 1974. R. Finnegan, Oral Poetry: Its Nature, Significance, and Social Context, Cambridge 1977. J.M. Foley, Oral-Formulaic Theory and Research: An Introduction and Annotated Bibliography, New York 1985 (Rpt. 1988, 1992. Updated electronic version at http://www.oraltradition.org) J.M. Foley (ed.), Oral Tradition in Literature: Interpretation in Context, Columbia 1986 J.M. Foley (ed.), Comparative Research on Oral Traditions: A Memorial for Milman Parry, Columbus Ohio 1987. J.M. Foley, The Theory of Oral Composition: History and Methodology, Bloomington 1988 (Rpt. 1992). J.M. Foley, Traditional Oral Epic: The Odyssey, Beowulf, and the South Slavic Return Song, Berkeley and Los Angeles 1990 (Rpt. 1993). J.M. Foley, Immanent Art: From Structure to Meaning in Traditional Oral Epic, Bloomington 1991. J.M. Foley, ‘Word-Power, Performance, and Tradition’, Journal of American Folklore 105 (1992), pp. 275-301. J.M. Foley, The Singer of Tales in Performance, Bloomington 1995a. J.M. Foley, ‘Folk Literature’, in D.C. Greetham (ed.), Scholarly Editing: A Guide to Research, New York 1995. J.M. Foley, ‘Oral Tradition and Its Implications’, in A new Companion to Homer, edd. I. Morris and B. Powell, Leiden 1997, pp. 146-73. J.M. Foley (ed.), Teaching Oral Traditions, New York 1998a. J.M. Foley, Homer's Traditional Art, University Park 1999. J.M. Foley, ‘What South Slavic Oral Epic Can - and Cannot - Tell Us about Homer’, in Epea Pteroenta. Beiträge zur Homerforschung, Stuttgart 2002, pp. 53-62. R. Friedrich, ‘The problem of an oral poetics’, in H.R. Runte – R. Runte (edd.), Orality and literature. Proceedings of the XIth congress of the International Comparative Literature Association, New York 1991, pp. 19-28 (ed. or. Paris 1985). D.K. Fry, ‘Some Aesthetic Implications of a New Definition of the Fomula’, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 69 (1968), pp. 516-522. D.M. Gunn, ‘Narrative Inconsistency and the Oral Dictated Text in the Homeric Epic’, AJPh 91 (1970), pp. 192-203. D.M. Gunn, ‘Thematic Composition and Homeric Authorship’, HSCPh 75 (1971), pp. 1-31. J.B. Hainsworth, The Flexibility of the Homeric Formula, Oxford 1968. J. B. Hainsworth, ‘Good and Bad Formulae’, in B.C. Fenik (ed), Homer: Tradition and Invention, Leiden 1978, pp. 41-50. J. B. Hainsworth, ‘The case of oral transmission’, CArchJ 2 (1992), pp. 122-123. B. Hainsworth, ‘Formulas’, in G.S. Kirk, The Iliad: a Commentary. Vol. III: books 9-12, Cambridge 1993, pp. 1-31. B. Hainsworth, ‘Meaning, Precision, and History in Homeric Diction’, AevAnt 12 (1999), pp. 5-15. E.A. Havelock, Preface to Plato, Cambridge Mass. 1963 (Rpt. 1982). E.A. Havelock, The Muse Learns to Write: Reflections on Orality and literacy from Antiquity to the Present, New Haven 1986. D.P. Henige, The Cronology of Oral Tradition: Quest for a Chimera, Oxford 1974. W.B. Stanford, ‘Euphonic Reason for the Choice of Homeric Formulae?’, Hermathena 108 (1969), pp. 14-17. W.S. Scott, The Oral Nature of the Homeric Simile, Leiden 1974. G. Nagy, ‘Homeric questions’, TAPhA 122 (1992), pp. 17-60. V. Ehrenberg, The People of Aristophanes, Oxford 1951. H.R. Immerwahr, ‘Book Rolls on Attic Vases’, in Classical Medieval and Renaissance Studies in Honour of B.L. Ullman, Roma 1964, pp. 17-48. F.G. Kenyon, Books and Readers in Ancient Greece and Rome, Oxford 1951. J. Platthy, Sources on the earliest greek libraries, Amsterdam 1968. A. Hoekstra, Homeric Modifications of Formulaic Prototypes, Amsterdam 1965. A. Hoekstra, The Sub-Epic Stage of the Formulaic Tradition: Studies in the Homeric Hymns to Apollo, to Aphrodite, and to Demeter, Amsterdam 1969. J. P. Holoka, ‘Homer studies 1971-1977’, CW 73 (1979), pp. 65-150. J. P. Holoka, ‘Homer studies 1978-1983. I’, CW 83 (1989-1990), pp. 393-461. J. P. Holoka, ‘Homer studies 1978-1983. II’, CW 84 (1990-1991), pp. 89-156. J. P. Holoka, ‘Homer, oral poetry theory, and comparative literature. Major trends and controversies in twentieth-century criticism’, in J. Latacz (ed.), Zweihundert Jahre Homer-Forschung. Rückblick und Ausblick, Stuttgard 1991, pp. 456-481. W.B. Ingalls, ‘Another Dimension of the Homeric Formula’, Phoenix 26 (1972), pp. 111-122. W.B. Ingalls, ‘The Analogical Formula in Homer’, TAPhA 106 (1976), pp. 211-226. R. Janko, ‘Equivalent Formulae in the Greek Epos’, Mnemosyne 34 (1981), pp. 251-264. R. Janko, ‘The Iliad and its Editors: Dictation and Redaction’, CA 9 (1990), pp. 326-34. P. Kiparsky, ‘Oral Poetry: Some Linguistic and Typological Considerations’, in B.A. Stolz – R.S. Shannon (edd.), Oral Literature and the Formula, Ann Arbor 1976, pp. 73-106. G.S. Kirk, The Songs of Homer, Cambridge 1962. G.S. Kirk, ‘Studies in Some Technical Aspects of Homeric Style’, YCS 20 (1966), pp. 73-152. W. Kullmann, ‘Oral poetry theory and neoanalysis in Homeric research’, Critical Exchange 16 (1984), pp. 9-22. W. Kullmann, ‘Oral poetry theory and neoanalysis in Homeric research’, GRBS 25 (1984), pp. 307-323. W. Kullmann, ‘”Oral tradition/oral history” und die frühgriechische Epik’, in J. Ungern-Sternberg – H. Reinau, Vergangenheit in mündlicher Überlieferung, Stuttgart 1988, pp. 184-196. W. Labov – J. Waletsky, ‘Narrative Analysis: Oral Version of Personal Experience’, in J. Helm (ed.), Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, Seattle 1967, pp. 12-44. J. Latacz (ed.), Homer, Tradition und Neuerung, Darmstadt 1979. A.B. Lord, The Singer of Tales, Cambridge Mass. 1960. (2nd ed. by S. Mitchell and G. Nagy, 2000, with audio and video CD). A.B. Lord, ‘Homer as Oral Poet’, HSCPh 72 (1968), pp. 1-46. A.B. Lord, Epic Singers and Oral Tradition, Ithaca 1991. A.B. Lord, The Singer Resumes the Tale, ed. by Mary Louise Lord, Ithaca 1995. G. Machacek, ‘The Occasional Contextual Appropiateness of Formulaic Diction in the Homeric Poems’, AJPh 115 (1994), pp. 321-335. E. A. MacKay (ed.), Signs of Orality: The Oral Tradition and Its Influence in the Greek and Roman World, Leiden 1999. R.P. Martin, ‘Homer's Iliad and Odyssey’, In J.M. Foley (ed.), Teaching Oral Traditions, New York 1998a, pp. 339-50. W.B. McCarthy, "Oral Theory and Epic Studies’, Choice 39.1 (September) (2001), pp. 61-75. M.N. Nagler, ‘Towards a Generative View of the Oral Formula’, TAPhA 98 (1967), pp. 269-311. M.N. Nagler, Spontaneity and Tradition: A Study in the Oral Art of Homer, Berkeley 1974 M.N. Nagler , ‘Ethical anxiety and artistic inconsistency. The case of oral epic, Cabinet of the Muses’, in M. Griffith – D.J. Mastronarde (edd.), Essays on classical and comparative literature in honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer, Atlanta 1990, pp. 225-239. G. Nagy, ‘Formula and Meter’, in B.A. Stolz – R.S. Shannon (edd.), Oral Literature and the Formula, Ann Arbor 1976, pp. 239-260. G. Nagy, Homeric Questions, Austin 1996a. G. Nagy, Poetry as Performance: Homer and Beyond, Cambridge 1996b. G. Nagy (ed.), Greek Literature. Vol. I The Oral Traditional Background of Ancient Greek Literature, New York - London 2001. J.D. Niles, Homo Narrans: The Poetics and Anthropology of Oral Literature, Philadelphia 1999. J.A. Notopoulos, ‘Parataxis in Homer: A New Approach to Homeric Literary Criticism’, TAPhA 80 (1949), pp. 1-23. J.A. Notopoulos, ‘Studies in Early Greek Oral Poetry’, HSCPh 68 (1964), pp. 1-77. E. O’Neill, ‘The Localization of Metrical Word-Types in the Greek Hexameter’, YCS 8 (1942), pp. 103-178. F.J. Oinas (ed.), Heroic Epic and Saga: An Introduction to the World's Great Folk Epics, Bloomington 1978. D.R. Olson, The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading, Cambridge 1994. W.J. Ong, Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word, New York and London 1982. D.W. Packard, ‘Sound-Patterns in Homer’, TAPhA 104 (1974), pp. 239-260. H.A. Paraskevaides, The Use of Synonyms in Homeric Formulaic Diction, Amsterdam 1984. M. Parry, The Making of Homeric Verse: The Collected Papers of Milman Parry, Oxford 1971 (Rpt. 1987). B. Peabody, The Winged Word: A Study in the Technique of Ancient Greek Oral Composition as Seen Principally through Hesiod’s Works and Days, Albany 1975. M.W.M. Pope, ‘The Parry-Lord Theory of Homeric Composition’, Acta Classica 6 (1963), pp. 1-21. N. Postlethwaite, ‘The Continuation of the Odyssey: Some Formulaic Evidence’, CPh 76 (1981), pp. 177-187. T.G. Rosenmeyer, ‘The Formula in Early Greek Poetry’, Arion 4 (1965), pp. 295-311. D.C. Rubin, Memory in Oral Traditions: The Cognitive Psychology of Epic, Ballads, and Counting-Out Rhymes, New York 1995. J. Russo, ‘A closer Look at Homeric Formulas’, TAPhA 94 (1963), pp. 235-247. J. Russo, ‘Is “Oral” or “Aural” Composition the Cause of Homer’s Formulaic Style’, in B.A. Stolz – R.S. Shannon (edd.), Oral Literature and the Formula, Ann Arbor 1976, pp. 31-54. J. Russo, ‘The Formula’, in A new Companion to Homer, edd. I. Morris and B. Powell, Leiden 1997, pp. 238-260. R. Sacks, The Traditionl Phrase in Homer. Two Studies in Form, Meaning and Interpretation, Leiden 1987. E.G. Turner, Athenian Books in the Fifth and Fourth Centuries BC, London 1952. E.G. Turner, ‘Greek Manuscripts of the Ancient World’, BICS suppl. 46 (1987), pp. 13-43. W.M. Sale, ‘The Formularity of the Place Phrases of the Iliad’, TAPhA 117 (1987), pp. 21-39. B.A. Stolz – R.S. Shannon (edd.), Oral Literature and the Formula, Ann Arbor 1976. S. Thompson, Motif Index of Folk Literature, Copenhagen 1955-1958. A. Thornton, People and Themes in Homer’s Odyssey, London 1970. O. Tsagarakis, Form and Content in Homer, Wiesbaden 1982. E. Visser, ‘Formulae or Single Words? Towards a New Theory of Homeric Verse-Making’, WJA N.F. 14 (1988), pp. 21-37. C.H. Whitman, Homer and the Heroic Tradition, Cambridge Mass. 1958 (rpt. New York 1965). D. Maddox – S. Sturm-Maddox (eds.), The Medieval French Alexander, Albany 2002. W.J. Aerts – J.M.M. Hermanns – E. Visser (eds.), Alexander the Great in the Middle Ages: ten studies on the last days of Alexander in literary and historical writing, Nijmegan 1978. N.J. Burich, Alexander the Great: A bibliography, Kent 1970. G. Cary, The Medieval Alexander, ed. by D.J.A. Ross, Cambridge 1956 (19672). A. Foulet, The Medieval French Roman d'Alexandre. Volume VI: Version of Alexandre de Paris, Introduction and Notes to Branch III, Princeton 1976. K. Müller, The Fragments of the Lost Historians of Alexander the Great. Fragmenta Scriptorum de Rebus Alexandri Magni, Pseudo-Callisthenes, Itinerarium Alexandri, Paris 1846. P. Noble - L. Polak - C. Isoz, The Medieval Alexander Legend and Romance Epic, New York – London - Liechtenstein 1982. F. de Polignac, ‘From the Mediterranean to Universality? The Myth of Alexander, Yesterday and Today’, Mediterranean Historical Review 14 (1999), pp. 1-17. R. Willis, The relatioship of the Spanish Libro de Alexandre to the Alexandreis of Gautier de Chantillon, Princeton 1934 (rist. New York 1965). R. Willis, The debt of the Spanish Libro de Alexandre to the French Roman dAlexandre, Princeton 1935 (rist. New York 1965). W.G. Arnott, Alexis. The Fragments. A Commentary, Cambridge 1996. F.A.G. Beck, Greek Education 450-350 BC, London 1964. V. Ehrenberg, The People of Aristophanes, Oxford 1951. W.J. Woodhouse, The composition of Homer’s Odyssey, Oxford 1930 R.B. Rutherford, ‘From the Iliad to the Odyssey’, in D.L. Cairns, Oxford Readings in Homer’s Iliad, Oxford 2001, pp. 117-146. L.M. Slatkin, The Power of Thetis: Allusion and Interpretation in the Iliad, Berkeley-Los Angeles 1991. D.J. Stewart, The Disguised Guest. Rank, role, and identity in the Odyssey, Lewisburg 1976. D. Wender, The Last Scene of the “Odyssey”, Leiden 1978. M.M. Willcock, ‘Ad Hoc Invention in the Iliad’, HSCP 81 (1977), pp. 41-54. S.R. van der Mije, ‘Achilles’ keuze: over l 488-9’, in A.M. van Erp Taalman Kip – D. den Hengst, J.J.L. Smolenaars (eds.), Propemptikon. Afscheidsbundel W. Kegel, Amsterdam 1988, pp. 31-35. J.V. Morrison, Homeric Misdirection. False Prediction in the Iliad, Ann Arbor 1992. O’Neill, ‘The Localization of Metrical Word-Types in the Greek Hexameter’, YClS 8 (1942). A. Parry (ed.), The Making of Homeric Verse. The Collected Papers of Milman Parry, Oxford 1971, pp. 1-190. J. Haig-Gaisser, ‘A Structural Analysis of the Digression in the Iliad and the Odyssey’, HSCPh 73 (1969), pp. 1-43. J. Griffin, The Odyssey, Cambridge 1987. W. Leaf, The Iliad. I, London 1902. R. Hope Simpson – J.F. Lazenby, The Catalogue of the Ships in Homer’s Iliad, Oxford 1970. G.L. Huxley, Greek Epic Poetry, from Eumelos to Panyassi, London 1969. R. Kannicht, ‘Poetry and Art: Homer and the Monuments Afresh’, CA 1 (1982), pp. 70-86. M. Katz, Penelope’s Renown: Meaning and Indeterminacy in the Odyssey, Princeton 1991. K.C. King, Achilles. Paradigms of the Hero from Homer to the Middle Ages, Berkeley – Los Angeles – Oxford 1987. R.S. Shannon (ed. by), Oral Literature and the Formula, Ann Arbor 1976, pp. 73-106. A. Ford, Homer: The Poetry of the Past, Ithaca 1992. T. Gantz, Early Greek Myth. A Guide to Literary and Artistic Sources, Baltimore and London 1993. J. Griffin, ‘Homeric Pathos and Objectivity’, CQ 26 (1976), pp. 161-187. J. Griffin, Homer on Life and Death, Oxford 1980. M.J. Alden, ‘The Role of Telemachus in the «Odysseia»’, Hermes 115 (1987), pp. 129-137. Ø. Andersen - M. Dickie (ed.), Homer's World. Fiction, Tradition, Reality, Bergen 1995. F.Ahl - H. Roisman, The Odyssey Re-Formed, Ithaca-London 1996 M.J. Anderson, The Fall of Troy in Early Greek Poetry and Art, Oxford 1997. P.B.S. Andrews, ‘The Falls of Troy in Greek Tradition’, G&R 12 (1965), pp. 28-37. M.J. Apthorp, ‘The Obstacles to Telemachus Return’, CQ 30 (1980), pp. 1-22. M. Artzy, ‘Nomads of the Sea’, in Res maritimae. Cyprus and the Eastern Mediterranean from Prehistory to Late Antiquity. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium "Cities on the Sea" (Nicosia October 18-22 1994), ed. by S. Swiny – R.L. Hohlfeder – H. Wylde Swiny, Atlanta 1997, pp. 1-16. A.T.L. Bergren, Odyssean Temporality: Many (Re)turns, in Approaches to Homer, ed. by C.A. Rubino and C.W. Shelmerdine, Austin 1983, 38-73. G. Bonfante, ‘The name of the Phoenicians’, CP 36 (1941), pp. 1-20. C.R. Beye, The “Iliad”, the “Odyssey”, and the Epic Tradition, New York 1966. C.M. Bowra, La poesia eroica I, Firenze 1979 (Heroic Poetry, London 1952) C. Broeniman, ‘Demodocus, Odysseus, and the Trojan War in Odyssey 8’, CW 90 (1996), pp. 3-13.